Decision date: 2019-05-23

Holding that, for Petitioner's applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT protection, the agency disregarded and distorted important aspects of Petitioner’s testimony in concluding that Salvadoran government was willing and able to protect her from her abuser.

Publication Status: Published

Case judge: King, Motz, Wynn

Decision: Orellana v. Barr, 925 F.3d 145 (4th Cir. 2019)