Decision date: 2018-12-21

Holding that, although the BIA failed to consider materially changed country conditions, namely the worsening oppression of Chinese Christians, the BIA did not err when it denied Petitioners' second motion to reopen because Petitioners did not establish prima facie eligibility for asylum, withholding, or protection under CAT.

Publication Status: Unpublished

Case judge: Diaz, King, Richardson

Decision: Ming Fang Chen v. Whitaker, 757 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2018) (No. 18-1110)